<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Hero Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theheromachine.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theheromachine.com</link>
	<description>A new model for corporate communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:11:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should business save the world? by Mark Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.theheromachine.com/should-business-save-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theheromachine.com/?p=413#comment-36</guid>
		<description>No.

If:
(a) = make money for shareholders.
(b) = ponce around saving the world
(c) = fire them
(d) = sue them
(e) = applause

And if:
(b) achieves (a) then shareholders should (e)

Otherwise:
Shareholders should (c) and (d)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
<p>If:<br />
(a) = make money for shareholders.<br />
(b) = ponce around saving the world<br />
(c) = fire them<br />
(d) = sue them<br />
(e) = applause</p>
<p>And if:<br />
(b) achieves (a) then shareholders should (e)</p>
<p>Otherwise:<br />
Shareholders should (c) and (d)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should business save the world? by Maja Pawinska Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.theheromachine.com/should-business-save-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Maja Pawinska Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theheromachine.com/?p=413#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Neil Crofts, he of Authentic Business (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Authentic-Business-Create-Your-Perfect/dp/1841126497) fame, based his ideas on the concept that if you are running a business that is totally in tune with your values, you can&#039;t help but be successful. I wonder if the same is true of &#039;good&#039; businesses - that genuinely doing something for the greater good that happens to be within a corporate structure rather than a charity means that profits are inevitable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Crofts, he of Authentic Business (<a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Authentic-Business-Create-Your-Perfect/dp/1841126497" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Authentic-Business-Create-Your-Perfect/dp/1841126497</a>) fame, based his ideas on the concept that if you are running a business that is totally in tune with your values, you can&#8217;t help but be successful. I wonder if the same is true of &#8216;good&#8217; businesses &#8211; that genuinely doing something for the greater good that happens to be within a corporate structure rather than a charity means that profits are inevitable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hill &amp; Knowlton sector model by Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.theheromachine.com/hill-knowlton-sector-model/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theheromachine.com/?p=368#comment-16</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really interesting point - Blue Rubicon has certainly been innovative in their use of research and planning too. I suppose the main point of difference is size and global reach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really interesting point &#8211; Blue Rubicon has certainly been innovative in their use of research and planning too. I suppose the main point of difference is size and global reach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hill &amp; Knowlton sector model by lorraine</title>
		<link>http://www.theheromachine.com/hill-knowlton-sector-model/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theheromachine.com/?p=368#comment-15</guid>
		<description>H&amp;K&#039;s change will make them more like blue rubicon....my view is that, give it a year or two and many of the larger agencies will operate this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H&amp;K&#8217;s change will make them more like blue rubicon&#8230;.my view is that, give it a year or two and many of the larger agencies will operate this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PRCA Founding Fellows are fellows by Natasha Woolsey</title>
		<link>http://www.theheromachine.com/prca-founding-fellows-are-fellows/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Woolsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theheromachine.com/?p=353#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this response Deborah - very thought provoking stuff and a great piece of PR for the PRCA. I&#039;m sure that this will inspire the female membership to examine these sorts of opportunities in greater detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this response Deborah &#8211; very thought provoking stuff and a great piece of PR for the PRCA. I&#8217;m sure that this will inspire the female membership to examine these sorts of opportunities in greater detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
